"Critical Pedagogy: A Look at the Major Concepts" by Peter McLaren
McLaren reminds us that critical theorists’ premise is “men
and women are essentially unfree and inhabit a world rife with contradictions
and asymmetries of power and privilege.” (61) Dialectical theory seeks out
those contradictions. It transforms the classroom, from just a place of
learning to a place of empowerment. We don’t just manufacture the next
generation of good capitalist citizens that stay in their social class.
Hopefully, we give them opportunity to rise above that. McLaren brings up how
objective writing can either be “macro” and related to the skills they will
need in a larger social context, or “micro” and only related as the content
chosen for them. Freire was disturbed that students were fed information and
never got to choose what they could learn. This is similar to “Micro”
objectives. I think of my class with essay writing. Up to this point they have
little experience with it and hate doing it. Each day or learning target revolves
around the part of the essay we are teaching. They do not understand that it
took them even longer to ever learn how to read, write a story, to add and
subtract, or even ride a bike. It’s a process. Our graphic organizers help them
with a step of the process. I say they will be writing essays for a long time
and they tell me they will not. After high school, I don’t know if they will
ever write an essay again. But I know they can use those writing skills and
thinking skills to comment on something on Reddit.com. Maybe their job will
require coherently written notes. But, teaching them essay writing is one tool
we are using to help the rise above their generational socio-economic status.
We just need to explain that.
Why are some knowledge and constructions taught more than
others to the majority over women and minorities? McLaren divides knowledge
into three parts: “productive knowledge” (facts), “practical knowledge”
(analyzing social situations), and “emancipatory knowledge” (how the other two
are distorted by privilege and power). Culture is how a group of people see
their situation and react to it. For many, that situation is of dependency and
without the opportunities of the dominant culture. In the hidden curriculum,
teachers unintentionally mold the students to the standards of society. McLaren
uses the example that we often give male students more intellectual praise than
female students. I have more female students in my accelerated class currently.
I think in some ways, the tables have turned. Society is still set up with
inequality everywhere. But new toys are created for female toddlers to enjoy
construction. Women receive scholarships for the sciences. I think we can
become intentional with those social lessons, to empower our students and
create a higher level of equality.
No comments:
Post a Comment